Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid

dc.contributor.authorFernandes, B. C. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartins, M. R. F. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMendes, A. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMilbradt, E. L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSanfelice, C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartins, B. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, E. F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBresne, C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-03T15:27:52Z
dc.date.available2015-11-03T15:27:52Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed at evaluating the intestinal integrity, using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the performance of broiler chickens fed additives alternative to antimicrobials. A total of 1080 male chicks were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design, with six treatments with six replicates of 30 birds each. The following treatments were evaluated: basal diet (control), basal diet supplemented with an antimicrobial, basal diet supplemented with a probiotic, basal diet supplemented with a prebiotic, basal diet with a symbiotic, and basal diet supplemented with organic acids. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and livability were recorded when broiler chickens were 10, 21, 35, and 42 days old. On day 42, 72 birds were individually weighed and sacrificed. In order to evaluate the morphometrics of the different intestinal wall layers, segments of the small intestine and the cecum were collected from two birds per replicate, and intestinal integrity (SEM) was evaluated in the same segments of two birds per treatment. During the starter period (1-21 days old), birds fed the alternative additives presented similar weight gain as those fed the antimicrobial product, but were not different from control birds. Feed conversion ratio of birds fed alternative additives was better than that of the control birds from one to 10 days of age, but not during the remaining rearing period, and was similar to the birds receiving the antimicrobial. The morphometric parameters of the different intestinal wall layers was not influenced by the treatments. During the total rearing period, the evaluated alternative additives did not improve intestinal integrity or broiler performance.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Anat, Biosci Inst, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Vet Clin, Sch Vet Med &Anim Sci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent417-424
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2014000400012&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science. Campinas: Facta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 417-424, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1516-635x1604417-424
dc.identifier.fileS1516-635X2014000400012.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1516-635X
dc.identifier.scieloS1516-635X2014000400012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/129929
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348143900012
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFacta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal Of Poultry Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.463
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopyen
dc.subjectMorphometricsen
dc.subjectIntestinal mucosaen
dc.subjectIntestinal wallen
dc.titleIntestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic aciden
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderFacta-fundacio Arnco Ciencia Tecnologia Avicolas
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica Veterinária - FMVZpt
unesp.departmentProdução Animal - FMVZpt
unesp.departmentAnatomia - IBBpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1516-635X2014000400012.pdf
Tamanho:
624.12 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format