Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Agreement Between Body Composition Assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Doubly Labeled Water in Obese Women Submitted to Bariatric Surgery: Body Composition, BIA, and DLW

dc.contributor.authorBeato, Gabriel Cunha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRavelli, Michele Novais [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCrisp, Alex Harley
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Maria Rita Marques [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionMethodist University of Piracicaba
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:18:41Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:18:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-15
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Bariatric surgery has a significant influence on body composition (BC), which should be monitored. However, there is a need to recommend low-cost practical methods, with good estimation of BC for class III obese and/or bariatric patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine accuracy and agreement between BC assessed by direct segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (DSM-BIA) and doubly labeled water (DLW) as reference method. Material and Methods: Twenty class III obese women (age 29.3 ± 5.1 years; body mass index 44.8 ± 2.4 kg/m 2 ) underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. BC (fat mass [FM], fat-free mass [FFM], and total body water [TBW]) was assessed by InBody 230 and DLW in the following periods: before and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Accuracy between the methods was evaluated by the bias and root mean square error. Pearson’s correlation, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate agreement between the methods. Results: Correlations were significant (p < 0.001) and CCC was good/excellent between both methods for the evaluation of FM (r = 0.84–0.92, CCC = 0.84–0.95), FFM (r = 0.73–0.90, CCC = 0.68–0.80), and TBW (r = 0.76–0.91, CCC = 0.72–0.81) before and after bariatric surgery. In addition, no significant bias was observed between DSM-BIA and DLW for FM (mean error [ME] = − 1.40 to 0.06 kg), FFM (ME = 0.91–1.86 kg), and TBW (ME = 0.71–1.24 kg) measurements. Conclusion: The DSM-BIA was able to estimate the BC of class III obese women submitted to bariatric surgery with values consistent with those of the DLW method.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara-Jaú Road, km 01, s/n
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250
dc.description.affiliationMethodist University of Piracicaba, Sugar Road, Km 156, Taquaral
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara-Jaú Road, km 01, s/n
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250
dc.format.extent183-189
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3505-4
dc.identifier.citationObesity Surgery, v. 29, n. 1, p. 183-189, 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11695-018-3505-4
dc.identifier.issn1708-0428
dc.identifier.issn0960-8923
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053683674
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/186883
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofObesity Surgery
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBariatric surgery
dc.subjectBioimpedance analysis
dc.subjectBody composition
dc.subjectDSM-BIA
dc.subjectFat mass
dc.subjectFat-free mass
dc.subjectTotal body water
dc.titleAgreement Between Body Composition Assessed by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Doubly Labeled Water in Obese Women Submitted to Bariatric Surgery: Body Composition, BIA, and DLWen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery95697b0b-8977-4af6-88d5-c29c80b5ee92
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1490-2817[1]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Araraquarapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt

Arquivos