Repository logo
 

Publication:
Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: Biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia

dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
dc.contributor.authorde Molon, Rafael Scaf [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Thallita Pereira
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Faloni, Ana Paula
dc.contributor.authorGulinelli, Jéssica Lemos
dc.contributor.authorLuvizuto, Eloá Rodrigues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionSagrado Coracao University - USC
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of Araraquara - UNIARA Dental School
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:04:04Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of bone substitutes in circumferential periimplant defects created in the rabbit tibia. Methods: Thirty rabbits received 45 implants in their left and right tibia. A circumferential bone defect (6.1 mm in diameter/4 mm depth) was created in each rabbit tibia using a trephine bur. A dental implant (4.1 mm × 8.5 mm) was installed after the creation of the defect, providing a 2-mm gap. The bone defect gaps between the implant and the bone were randomly filled according to the following groups: blood clot (CO), particulate Bio-Oss® (BI), and Bio-Oss® Collagen (BC). Ten animals were euthanized after periods of 15, 30, and 60 days. Biomechanical analysis by means of the removal torque of the implants, as well as histologic and immunohistochemical analyses for protein expression of osteocalcin (OC), Runx2, OPG, RANKL, and TRAP were evaluated. Results: For biomechanics, BC showed a better biological response (61.00± 15.28 Ncm) than CO (31.60± 14.38 Ncm) at 30 days. Immunohistochemical analysis showed significantly different OC expression in CO and BC at 15 days, and also between the CO and BI groups, and between the CO and BC groups at 60 days. After 15 days, Runx2 expression was significantly different in the BI group compared to the CO and BC groups. RANKL expression was significantly different in the BI and CO groups and between the BI and BC groups at 15 days, and also between the BI and CO groups at 60 days. OPG expression was significantly higher at 60 days postoperatively in the BI group than the CO group. Conclusions: Collectively, our data indicate that, compared to CO and BI, BC offered better bone healing, which was characterized by greater RUNX2, OC, and OPG immunolabeling, and required greater reversal torque for implant removal. Indeed, along with BI, BC presents promising biomechanical and biological properties supporting its possible use in osteoconductive grafts for filling peri-implant gaps.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology Sagrado Coracao University - USC
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Sciences Implantology Post Graduation Course University Center of Araraquara - UNIARA Dental School
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araraquara
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Sao Paulo State University - UNESP School of Dentistry at Araçatuba
dc.format.extent176-196
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.176
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science, v. 46, n. 3, p. 176-196, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.176
dc.identifier.issn2093-2286
dc.identifier.issn2093-2278
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84977615428
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/173194
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontal and Implant Science
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,577
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,577
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBone substitutes
dc.subjectBone transplantation
dc.subjectDental implantation
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectRabbits
dc.titleEvaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: Biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibiaen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt
unesp.departmentCiências Básicas - FOApt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Files