Avaliação da resistência à fratura e tensões em diferentes implantes e conexões protéticas: Análise in vitro e MEF-3D
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2013-08-28
Autores
Faco, Eduardo Francisco de Souza [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
As conexões pilar-implante podem ser classificadas em externas ou internas, sendo responsáveis por influenciar não o comportamento mecânico do sistema. A conexão interna apresenta melhor selamento biológico e distribuição de forças e maior estabilidade quando comparados à conexão externa. Em algumas situações, os implantes e as estruturas a ele conectadas podem fraturar, tornando-se um grave problema para a reabilitação protética. Os implantes também podem ser inseridos em rebordos alveolares com pouca espessura, para isso, possuem diâmetros reduzidos, demonstrado uma taxa de sobrevida e de sucesso similares aos dos implantes com diâmetro regular. PROPOSIÇÃO: Investigar a resistência à fratura entre diferentes conexões, com ou sem a interposição de mini-pilar e implantes com diâmetro reduzido por meio de teste de compressão em uma máquina de ensaio universal e as distribuições de tensões nos conjuntos e parafusos de retenção pelo método de elementos finitos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: 98 implantes divididos em 14 grupos (n=7), de acordo com sua conexão protética e diâmetros diferentes. Estes implantes foram inseridos em cilindros de resina com inclinação de 30° e com 3 mm de exposição. Utilizou-se pilares UCLAs e intermediários tipo mini-pilares de 2 mm. Os ensaios mecânicos foram realizados por um máquina de ensaio universal e o MEF-3D no programa computacional Solidworks®. RESULTADOS: Nos implantes de 4.0 mm de diâmetro com UCLA os maiores valores, foram obtidos, de forma decrescente: cone Morse hexagonal (CMH) , hexágono interno morse (HIM) , hexágono interno (HI) , hexágono externo (HE), cone Morse (CM), cone Morse hexagonal com microroscas (CMHM); no grupo de implantes com diâmetro reduzido os valores foram: cone morse com diâmetro reduzido (CMDR), corpo único reduzido (UNDR) e hexágono externo com...
The implant-abutment connections can be classified as external or internal, being responsible for influencing not only the mechanical behavior of the system, but also the response of the peri-implant tissues. The internal connection provides better sealing and biological distribution of forces and greater stability when compared to the external connection. In some cases, implants and structures connected to it may fracture and become a serious problem for prosthetic rehabilitation. Implants can also be inserted into alveolar ridges with little thickness to it, have reduced diameter, demonstrated a rate of survival and success similar to the regular diameter implants. PURPOSE: To investigate the fracture resistance between different connections, with or without the interposition of mini-implant and abutment with the reduced diameter through compression test on a universal testing machine and the finite element method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 98 implants were divided into 14 groups (n = 7), according to their different diameters and prosthetic connection. These implants were inserted into the resin cylinder with an inclination of 30 ° and 3 mm exposure. We used UCLAs pillars and intermediate mini-pillars 2 mm. The mechanical tests were performed by a universal testing machine and MEF-in 3D computer program Solidworks ®. RESULTS: In implants of 4.0 mm diameter with UCLA and the highest values were obtained in decreasing the hexagon morse taper (HCM) , internal hexagon morse (HIM) , internal hexagon (HI) ,external hexagon (HE) , morse taper (CM), microthread hexagonal morse taper (CMHM) in a group of implants with reduced diameter values were worn diameter morse taper (CMDR) , worn diameter only body (UNDR) and external hexagon with worn diameter (HEDR). With the use of an abutment higher values of tensile strength were observed in the implants HI followed ...
The implant-abutment connections can be classified as external or internal, being responsible for influencing not only the mechanical behavior of the system, but also the response of the peri-implant tissues. The internal connection provides better sealing and biological distribution of forces and greater stability when compared to the external connection. In some cases, implants and structures connected to it may fracture and become a serious problem for prosthetic rehabilitation. Implants can also be inserted into alveolar ridges with little thickness to it, have reduced diameter, demonstrated a rate of survival and success similar to the regular diameter implants. PURPOSE: To investigate the fracture resistance between different connections, with or without the interposition of mini-implant and abutment with the reduced diameter through compression test on a universal testing machine and the finite element method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 98 implants were divided into 14 groups (n = 7), according to their different diameters and prosthetic connection. These implants were inserted into the resin cylinder with an inclination of 30 ° and 3 mm exposure. We used UCLAs pillars and intermediate mini-pillars 2 mm. The mechanical tests were performed by a universal testing machine and MEF-in 3D computer program Solidworks ®. RESULTS: In implants of 4.0 mm diameter with UCLA and the highest values were obtained in decreasing the hexagon morse taper (HCM) , internal hexagon morse (HIM) , internal hexagon (HI) ,external hexagon (HE) , morse taper (CM), microthread hexagonal morse taper (CMHM) in a group of implants with reduced diameter values were worn diameter morse taper (CMDR) , worn diameter only body (UNDR) and external hexagon with worn diameter (HEDR). With the use of an abutment higher values of tensile strength were observed in the implants HI followed ...
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Implantes dentários, Fratura, Método dos elementos finitos, Dental implants
Como citar
FACO, Eduardo Francisco de Souza. Avaliação da resistência à fratura e tensões em diferentes implantes e conexões protéticas: Análise in vitro e MEF-3D. 2013. 86 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, 2013.