A comparative analisys of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with stress and urge urinary incontinence

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Data

2012-09-01

Autores

Gameiro, Monica Orsi [UNESP]
Moreira, Eliane Cristina
Ferrari, Renata Spagnoli [UNESP]
Kawano, Paulo Roberto [UNESP]
Padovani, Carlos Roberto [UNESP]
Amaro, João Luiz [UNESP]

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Brazilian Soc Urol

Resumo

Aims: To assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI).Materials and Methods: 51 women were prospectively divided into two groups, according to the symptoms as SUI (G1 = 22) or UUI (G2 = 29). Demographic data, such as number of pads/ 24 hours, number of micturations/ 24 hours and nocturia, delay time of urgent void (i.e., the time period for which an urgent void could be voluntarily postponed), number of parity and vaginal deliveries were obtained using a clinical questionnaire. Objective urine loss was evaluated by 60-min. Pad Test, subjective urine stream interruption test (UST) and visual survey of perineal contraction. Objective evaluations of PFM were performed in all patients (vaginal manometry).Results: Median of age, mean number of pads/ 24 hours, nocturia and warning time were significantly higher in UUI comparing to SUI group. During UST, 45.45% in G1 and 3.44%, in G2, were able to interrupt the urine stream (p < 0.001). The 60-min. Pad Test was significantly higher in G2 compared to G1 women (2.7 +/- 2.4 vs 1.5 +/- 1.9 respectively, p = 0.049). Objective evaluation of PFM strength was significantly higher in the SUI than in the UUI patients. No statistical difference was observed regarding other studied parameters.Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle weakness was significantly higher in women with UUI when compared to SUI.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

Pelvic Floor, Women, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urinary Incontinence, Urge

Como citar

International Braz J Urol. Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Soc Urol, v. 38, n. 5, p. 661-666, 2012.