Avaliação do nível de compreensão das orientações pós-operatórias dos pacientes após a realização de exodontia dos terceiros molares.
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2020-11-26
Autores
Silva, Leonardo Perazza da [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar o nível de compreensão dos pacientes em relação as orientações pós operatórias realizadas após cirurgia de extração dos terceiros molares. Os pacientes selecionados passaram por prévia coleta de dados e orientações sobre a pesquisa e termo de consentimento. Após o procedimento cirúrgico, receberam instruções para o pós operatório de acordo com o grupo da pesquisa em que foram alocados e seguiram para realizar o questionário juntamente com o entrevistador. Depois, foram feitas novas instruções de acordo com o grupo que estavam. Em sua maioria, os resultados demonstraram um equilíbrio entre os grupos de pacientes e suas diferentes formas de orientação pós operatória, apresentando significância estatística apenas com o ato de “não cuspir” (p = 0,025). Outro dado relevante, foi a alta porcentagem de pacientes que responderam de forma equivocada quanto ao intervalo de uso entre as doses e ao total de dias de uso do antibiótico (27,5%) e antinflamatório (45%). A instrução sobre o trismo e como amenizá-lo também foi um ponto de destaque, já que apenas 7,5% dos pacientes responderam de forma correta a sua questão dentro do questionário. Concluímos com este trabalho a importância das orientações pós operatórias para o paciente, como forma de melhorar a sua recuperação cirúrgica, entretanto, estudos ainda devem ser realizados com diferentes abordagens de orientações. Ainda, pode-se concluir que mesmo em pacientes com nível sociocultural considerável, houve dificuldade na compreensão das orientações e em segui-las.
The aim of the work was to evaluate the level of understanding of patients in relation to the postoperative orientations performed after third molar extraction surgery. The selected patients underwent previous data collection and orientation about the research and consent form. After the surgical procedure, they received instructions for the postoperative according to the research group in which they were allocated and proceeded to perform the questionnaire together with the interviewer. Then, new instructions were made according to the group they were in. Most of the results showed a balance between the groups of patients and their different forms of postoperative orientation, presenting statistical significance only with the act of not spitting (p = 0.025). Another relevant data was the high percentage of patients who answered wrongly regarding the interval of use between doses and total days of antibiotic use (27.5%) and antinflammatory use (45%). The instruction about the trismus and how to soften it was also a point of emphasis, since only 7.5% of patients answered correctly their question within the questionnaire. We conclude with this work the importance of postoperative orientations for the patient, as a way to improve his surgical recovery, however, studies still have to be done with different approaches of orientation. We can also conclude that, even at a high socio-cultural level in the research, there was difficulty in understanding the orientations and in following them, making the importance of this research greater.
The aim of the work was to evaluate the level of understanding of patients in relation to the postoperative orientations performed after third molar extraction surgery. The selected patients underwent previous data collection and orientation about the research and consent form. After the surgical procedure, they received instructions for the postoperative according to the research group in which they were allocated and proceeded to perform the questionnaire together with the interviewer. Then, new instructions were made according to the group they were in. Most of the results showed a balance between the groups of patients and their different forms of postoperative orientation, presenting statistical significance only with the act of not spitting (p = 0.025). Another relevant data was the high percentage of patients who answered wrongly regarding the interval of use between doses and total days of antibiotic use (27.5%) and antinflammatory use (45%). The instruction about the trismus and how to soften it was also a point of emphasis, since only 7.5% of patients answered correctly their question within the questionnaire. We conclude with this work the importance of postoperative orientations for the patient, as a way to improve his surgical recovery, however, studies still have to be done with different approaches of orientation. We can also conclude that, even at a high socio-cultural level in the research, there was difficulty in understanding the orientations and in following them, making the importance of this research greater.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Procedimentos cirúrgicos bucais, Odontólogos, Complicações pós-operatórias, Postoperative complications