A comparative analisys of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with stress and urge urinary incontinence

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorGameiro, Monica Orsi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Eliane Cristina
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Renata Spagnoli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKawano, Paulo Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPadovani, Carlos Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmaro, João Luiz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionParaná State University
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T06:37:15Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T06:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-31
dc.description.abstractAims: To assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Materials and Methods: 51 women were prospectively divided into two groups, according to the symptoms as SUI (G1 = 22) or UUI (G2 = 29). Demographic data, such as number of pads 24 hours, number of micturations 24 hours and nocturia, delay time of urgent void (i.e., the time period for which an urgent void could be voluntarily postponed), number of parity and vaginal deliveries were obtained using a clinical questionnaire. Objective urine loss was evaluated by 60-min. Pad Test, subjective urine stream interruption test (UST) and visual survey of perineal contraction. Objective evaluations of PFM were performed in all patients (vaginal manometry). Results: Median of age, mean number of pads 24 hours, nocturia and warning time were significantly higher in UUI comparing to SUI group. During UST, 45.45% in G1 and 3.44%, in G2, were able to interrupt the urine stream (p < 0.001). The 60-min. Pad Test was significantly higher in G2 compared to G1 women (2.7 ± 2.4 vs 1.5 ± 1.9 respectively, p = 0.049). Objective evaluation of PFM strength was significantly higher in the SUI than in the UUI patients. No statistical difference was observed regarding other studied parameters. Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle weakness was significantly higher in women with UUI when compared to SUI.en
dc.description.affiliationPhysiotherapy Service School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Urology School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biostatistics School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationPhysiotherapy Department Health Sciences Center Paraná State University, Londrina, Paraná
dc.description.affiliationUnespPhysiotherapy Service School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Urology School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biostatistics School of Medicine São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu
dc.format.extent661-666
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382012000500011
dc.identifier.citationInternational Braz J Urol, v. 38, n. 5, p. 661-666, 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S1677-55382012000500011
dc.identifier.issn1677-5538
dc.identifier.issn1677-6119
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871560916
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227072
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Braz J Urol
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectPelvic floor
dc.subjectStress
dc.subjectUrge
dc.subjectUrinary incontinence
dc.subjectWomen
dc.titleA comparative analisys of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with stress and urge urinary incontinenceen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Urologia - FMB
Artigos - Bioestatística - IBB