Comparación de tres métodos para estimar estabilidad del rendimiento en nueve variedades de algodón

dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Tehuni [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMonteverde, Edgardo
dc.contributor.authorMarín, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMadriz I., Petra M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUCV
dc.contributor.institutionEEUU
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CENIAP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:28Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:28Z
dc.date.issued2007-05-01
dc.description.abstractWith the purpose of selecting and recommending promissory cultivars of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (L) with high yield potential and stability, for crop areas in Venezuela, the yield (seed included) of nine cotton varieties was evaluated. The data from the 1995-96 and 1996-97 cycles was used. The experimental design was a randomized completed block design with four repetitions on twelve environments. Parameters of stability offered by the methods of Eberhart and Russell, (1966), Cruz et al. (1989) and the AMMI model were estimated and compared to determine the best method or combination. There was no coincidence between the best yield varieties, Unellez-2 and the commercial variety Delta Pine 16, in relation to stability criteria. According to Eberhart and Russell, these were classified as stable, while according to Cruz et al. they were adaptive to favorable environments and according to AMMI they were unstable with high interaction,.Of the three methods studied, the AMMI model allowed associating the response of high yield varieties to specific environments, gave more information and was easier to interpret.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUCV
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of North Carolina EEUU
dc.description.affiliationUnidad de Bioestadística Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrícolas (INIA) Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CENIAP)
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Agronomía Facultad de Agronomía UCV, El Limón, Maracay 2101, Estado Aragua
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent344-348
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0378-18442007000500012&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=pt
dc.identifier.citationInterciencia, v. 32, n. 5, p. 344-348, 2007.
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-35148857081.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0378-1844
dc.identifier.scieloS0378-18442007000500012
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-35148857081
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69661
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.ispartofInterciencia
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.258
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,183
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGossypium hirsutum
dc.titleComparación de tres métodos para estimar estabilidad del rendimiento en nueve variedades de algodónes
dc.title.alternativeComparison of three methods for estimation of yield stability in nine cotton cultivarsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.scielo.org.ve/revistas/inci/paboutj.htm

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-35148857081.pdf
Tamanho:
149.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Coleções