Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle cocontraction in women with and without pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorVesentini, Giovana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorEl Dib, Regina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRighesso, Leonardo Augusto Rachele
dc.contributor.authorPiculo, Fernanda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarini, Gabriela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Guilherme Augusto Rago [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCalderon, Iracema de Mattos Paranhos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRudge, Marilza Vieira Cunha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionMcMaster University
dc.contributor.institutionMainz University Medical Center
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Sagrado Coracao
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:47:55Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:47:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractThere is an ongoing discussion regarding abdominal muscle (AbM) and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) synergism. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the cocontraction between AbMs and PFMs in women with or without pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). The following databases were searched up to December 21, 2018: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, PEDro and CENTRAL. We included any study that assessed the cocontraction between PFMs and AbMs in women with and without PFD. Two reviewers independently screened eligible articles and extracted data. The outcomes were extracted and analyzed as continuous variables with random effect models. Twenty studies were included. A meta-analysis did not show differences in women with and without PFD. However, a sensitivity analysis suggested cocontraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) during PFM contraction in healthy women (standardized mean difference (SMD) 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.90 to 0.14], P=0.02; I2= not applicable; very low quality of evidence). Women with PFD during contraction of PFMs showed cocontraction of the obliquus internus (OI) (SMD 1.10 [95% CI 0.27 to 1.94], P=0.01; I2= not applicable; very low quality of evidence), and obliquus externus (OE) (SMD 2.08 [95% CI 1.10 to 3.06], Po0.0001; I2 = not applicable; very low quality of evidence). Increased cocontraction of the TrA may be associated with maximal contraction of PFMs in women without PFD. On the other hand, there is likely an increased cocontraction with the OI and OE in women with PFD.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Biociencias e Diagnostico Bucal Instituto de Ciencia e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationMcMaster Institute of Urology McMaster University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mainz University Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ciencias da Saude Universidade Sagrado Coracao
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Ginecologia e Obstetricia Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Biociencias e Diagnostico Bucal Instituto de Ciencia e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2014/26852-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/09710-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 302284/2014-1
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 310953/2015-4
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1319
dc.identifier.citationClinics, v. 74.
dc.identifier.doi10.6061/clinics/2019/e1319
dc.identifier.fileS1807-59322019000100317.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1807-5932
dc.identifier.scieloS1807-59322019000100317
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075775670
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/199735
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinics
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAbdominopelvic Muscles
dc.subjectPelvic Floor Disorders
dc.subjectPelvic Floor Function
dc.subjectSynergism
dc.titlePelvic floor and abdominal muscle cocontraction in women with and without pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Maríliapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentFisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional - FFCpt
unesp.departmentGinecologia e Obstetrícia - FMBpt
unesp.departmentBiociências e Diagnóstico Bucal - ICTpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1807-59322019000100317.pdf
Tamanho:
1.4 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format